The ColdFusion MX DevNet Edition license agreement does not permit using this edition in production, and at runtime the DevNet Edition injects a "watermark" into the generated output from a template. The watermarks can be seen as an additional META tag as shown here:
<META NAME="ColdFusionMXEdition" CONTENT="ColdFusion DevNet Edition - Not for Production Use.">
While this watermark does not adversely affect generated html output, it can break generated xml well-formedness if you're not careful. To avoid the watermark being added to generated xml output be sure to set the content-type to "text/xml" in your template. If you generate xml and output it without setting the content-type to "text/xml", then the xml will get the watermark and when the browser's built-in parser attempts to style the xml for display it will generate an error. The error provided by MSIE 6.02 is the following:
The XML page cannot be displayed
Cannot view XML input using XSL style sheet. Please
correct the error and then click the Refresh button, or try again later.
------------------------------------------------
The following tags were not closed: META.
I've written this example which you can download and test yourself. The test has the following four options:
- [ok] view generated xml from a cfm with content type set to type/xml (no watermark)

- [error] view generated xml from a cfm without any content type set explicitly, which defaults to text/html (has watermark)

- [ok] view xslt output of generated xml (has watermark)

- [ok] view xml dump (has watermark)

If using a ColdFusion MX DevNet License, the solution for generating xml without the DevNet watermark is to set the content type to text/xml. The solution for generating plaintext files without the DevNet watermark is to set the content type to text/plain.
Download Example (doesn't work in cfmx 7 as is)
Available as Technote
I have a Dev Net edition for CF 7 and tried your code for stopping the watermark on a standard cold fusion template using the CFCONTENT set to text/plain and i still get the watermark.
What do you suggest?
Thanks!
Joel